HOW TO SHUT DOWN BOGUS RIGHT WING TALKING POINTS!

By Jack Jodell, Apr.27, 2012

I’ve been kind of out of it lately dealing with a bad cold and communicating with friends and relatives about the condition of my cancer-afflicted younger brother. I noticed the very relevant piece below recemtly over at the excellent website Politics Plus (http://politicsplus.org/blog/). As TomCat always says about his site “THOU SHALT STEAL!”, I am taking his advice and am reproducing it here for you. As we are beginning another election season, you know full well that those mean-spirited liars on the far right will be doing everything they can to distort the facts on issues, this should provide you with some excellent ways to immediately discredit their attempts. Arranged topic by topic, you will find it very useful in shutting down these bogus right-wing talking points!

Responses To RightWing Talking Points

This page will provide liberals evidence and arguments to counter various right-wing myths.

Inserted from <Progressive Information Project>

I trust you will find it as useful as I do.

Share
Posted in "free market" economics, Bush tax cuts for the rich, capitalism, commentary, conservative Republicans, corporate greed, Democratic Party, economics, extremists | Tagged | 12 Comments

HEADS ARE DEFINITELY GONNA ROLL!

By Jack Jodell, Apr. 18, 2012

Exactly a month ago, I posted the story of my 52 year old brother, who had noticed some digestive discomfort and had checked himself into the hospital, only to be released a mere 2 days later, after having undergone inconclusive testing,  having had his stomach evacuated of its contents, been pumped full of morphine and given a useless enema, and then being discharged on the grounds that “…this is simply a matter of economics. According to the tests we have done, you are simply constipated, and we cannot justify tying up a hospital bed for constipation.”

Well, that was then, and this is now. It turns out my brother was severely MISdiagnosed, and was actually afflicted with STAGE 3 ESOPHAGEAL CANCER! Unbelievable, but true, and due to gross negligence on the part of an overly eager and irresponsible hospitalist at that original hospital, my brother may very well be facing a painful and agonizing death as a result. Needlessly! 

Let’s face it, folks: ANY physician worth a grain of salt would certainly suspect something to be afoul when presented with a patient whose abdomen was becoming markedly distended, had a rapid fall-off in appetite, and an accompanying rapid loss in weight! After all, mere constipation, by itself, doesn’t lead to an increasingly bloated and painful belly! Nor do the presence of gallstones.  But a suspicious-looking intestinal mass as revealed in what were called “inconclusive” x-rays WOULD be cause for concern, wouldn’t YOU think? Evidently not to the General Practicioner who first examined my brother, nor to the hospitalist who booted him, against his better judgment and pleas for more thorough testing, out of the hospital! This gross negligence is inexcusable, but fully understandable in a very flawed health care system which places hospital and insurance company profits well before true patient care and comfort! 

Through a great level of mental anguish, physical pain, insurance company resistance, and determined persistence on my brother’s part, he was admitted to another, BETTER hospital, which quickly made the correct diagnosis of his condition. He was immediately given exploratory surgery along with three separate biopsies, and that is when the cancer was discovered.  He had displayed none of the classical symptoms of esophageal cancer: no acid reflux; no difficulty in swallowing. It wasn’t until his appetite had fallen off and a feeling of fullness and pain had set in that he became alarmed enough to seek further help. Indeed, roughly six weeks before, when I had last seen him, he appeared to be the very picture of health! Now, unfortunately, he was in a fight for his life!

He has now undergone two rounds of chemotherapy and will receive more on an outpatient basis in another week or so. I talked to him yesterday on the phone. He sounded understandably weak and a bit frail. I winced as he saud, “Jack, you wouldn’t even recognize me now. My eyes are all sunken-in, and I look about half the weight of the most emaciated Auschwitz victim you have ever seen. The skin on my arms is hanging in flaps.” He continued, “i’m gonna ride this out and file a lawsuit against that first hospital—I think their bungling has cost me at least a stage!”

The bungling he referred to may have cost him more than a stage; it may eventually cost him his very life. For there is a marked difference in the survival rates of patients with stage 2 as opposed to stage 3 esophageal cancer. Jist google “esophageal cancer stages” and you’ll see what I am ralking about. Still, my brother is very determined, and definitely wants to survive this. But I am realistic and have mentally prepared myself for what may very well occur sooner rather than later. And I share his fury. 

Adenocarcinoma, the variety of esophageal cancer he has, arises in the glandular cells and can at times be difficult to spot by either CT scan or x-ray. It is the same cancer which killed my mother 2 years ago, although in her case, they never were able to determine exactly which glandular site it had originated from. But clearly, in view of the symptoms my brother had displayed while in the first hospital, the decision to discharge him was premature, ill-founded, and deadly.

My sincere thanks to all who have, or who will, express their best wishes and concern as we grapple with this serious matter.

Heads are definitely gonna roll! Most deservedly. I only hope my little brother will survive long enough, and have enough resources, to see that his just rewards are realized!

Posted in commentary, corporate greed, economics | Tagged , , | 21 Comments

WHY YOUR TAXES ARE MUCH HIGHER THAN THEY SHOULD BE!

By Jack Jodell, Apr. 13, 2012

I saw this post a few days back at Ted McLaughlin’s brilliant site JOBSANGER (http://jobsanger.blogspot.com/). For those not familiar, I recommend that you vusit it regularly, as I do.This being income tax time, it ought to make your blood boil. Or, at the very least, perhaps you could avoid doing business with any of these firms until they come to their senses and start paying THEIR FAIR SHARE OF TAXES!

Pepco Holdings……………$1,263,000,000 (-39.5%)
General Electric……………$19,616,000,000 (-18.9%) Paccar……………$955,000,000 (-13.0%)
PG&E Corp…………….$6,001,000,000 (-18.4%) NiSource……………$1,853,000,000 (-13.0%)
CenterPoint Energy……………$3,081,000,000 (-11.3%)
Tenet Healthcare……………$582,000,000 (-8.2%)
Atmos Energy……………$1,203,000,000 (-9.6%)
Integrys Energy Group……………$1,178,000,000 (-11.6%)
American Electric Power……………$8,229,000,000 (-6.4%)
Con-way……………$422,000,000 (-5.4%)
Ryder System……………$843,000,000 (-5.4%)
Baxter International……………$1,297,000,000 (-0.6%)
Wisconsin Energy……………$2,442,000,000 (-13.2%)
Duke Energy……………$7,234,000,000 (-3.5%)
DuPont……………$2,995,000,000 (10.9%)
Consolidated Edison……………$5,869,000,000 (-1.3%)
Verizon Communications……………$19,783,000,000 (-3.8%)
Interpublic Group……………$989,000,000 (-2.5%)
CMS Energy……………$1,872,000,000 (-1.4%)N
extEra Energy……………$8,844,000,000 (-2.0%)
Navistar International……………$1,144,000,000 (-1.3%)
Boeing……………$14,847,000,000 (-5.5%)
Wells Fargo……………$69,158,000,000 (3.8%)
El Paso……………$4,649,000,000 (-0.9%)Mattel……………$1,492,000,000 (-0.9%)
Honeywell International……………$5,215,000,000 (2.0%)
DTE Energy……………$3,456,000,000 (0.2%)Apache……………$5,989,000,000 (-0.3%)Corning……………$2,943,000,000 (-0.2%)

The companies listed above are the companies that were exposed last year as paying no income taxes for 2008, 2009, and 2010. In fact, most of those companies not only didn’t pay any taxes, but got money from the government thanks to unneeded subsidies. The Citizens for Tax Justice decided to take another look and see if anything had changed for these companies when the year 2011 is figured in.

The figures above are for the years 2008 through 2011. The first figure is the amount of profit the company made (and note they all did very well (making hundreds of millions to billions of dollars). The figure in parentheses is the percentage of taxes paid — with a negative percentage meaning the company got money from the government instead of paying taxes.

Only four of these companies paid any taxes for the four year period — DTE Energy (0.2%), Honeywell International (2.0%), Wells Fargo (3.8%), and DuPont (10.9%). And the rates they paid are far, far below the tax rate paid by a middle class taxpayer in the United States. I can’t imagine that any reasonable person could think that was fair. Even right-wing icon Ronald Reagan didn’t believe such a situation was fair. He said the rich (and corporations) should not pay a smaller tax percentage than a “bus driver”.

This is a major reason why the deficits keep growing — because corporate tax revenues have fallen so far from what they used to be. If these companies had paid their fair share of taxes from 2008 through 2001, the government would have collected an additional $78.3 billion.

We have let the Republican Party, through their ridiculous “trickle-down” economic policy, give far too much away to the corporations. There is no reason why companies making huge profits should not pay their fair share of taxes. It’s time to remedy this situation.
————————————————————————————–
Ted, thank you for sharing this fabulous information. It shows how insulting and fraudulent the reactionary conservative Republican claim that we are overtaxing our very piggish corporations is! It also shows how utterly ridiculous  tax-hating trust funder GROVER NORQUIST is in his foolish campaign to keep every officeholder from ever raising any tax for any reason!

Posted in commentary, conservative Republicans, corporate greed, economics, Politics, taxes | Tagged , | 6 Comments

LONG OVERDUE; VERY MUCH DESERVED!

By Jack Jodell, Apr. 8, 2012

President Obama delivered a long overdue, very much deserved tongue-lashing to the House Republicans last week, and I agreed with every word he said. He rightfully accused them of  fostering economic inequality, and said their current budget plan was “so far to the right it makes the [1994 Newt Gingrich] ‘Contract With America’ look like the New Deal!” Obama continued, “It is thinly-veiled Social Darwinism… antithetical to our entire history as a land of opportunity and upward mobility for everyone who’s willing to work for it – a place where prosperity doesn’t just trickle down from the top, but grows outward from the heart of the middle class.” Attaway, Mr. President!

It was the strongest statement yet by the President against the Teapublican caucus, and was also aimed at their sympathizer-in-chief, presidential wannabe and uber-millionaire Mitt Romney. You know – the Mitt Romney who “likes to fire people” and says that “corporations are people.” For Romney, the opportunist former-moderate, has suddenly turned ultra-conservative this election cycle, and has hurriedly  endorsed this draconian measure because he smelled a Republican vote in doing so. This is a man devoid of all character and pribciple, save for his own personal profit and political advancement.

Romney applauds drastic cuts in entitlement programs which benefit needy people. He doesn’t care how many holes are put into our social safety net, nor even if it is cut to shreds. Neither do House Speaker John Boehner nor House Majority Leader (until the next election, that is) Eric Cantor. All they care about is protecting billionaires from ANY possible tax increases and chopping overall spending, except on defense, Obama pointed out correctly that this budget would gut the very things that are needed to grow an economy: education and training; research and development; and infrastructure. He called this monstrosity “a prescription for decline.” He then went on to say that “one of my potential opponebts, Gov. Romney, has said that he hoped a similar version of this plan would be introduced on day one of his presidency…he said that he’s very supportive of this new budget and even called it marvelous, which is a word you don’t often hear  when  it comes to describing a budget.”

This “marvelous” and “new” plan is actually neither, as it is merely the resurrection of the horrible brainchild plan of Rep. Paul Ryan that was previously submitted and roundly rejected last year.  You rememer – THE Paul Ryan, the guy with the 1920s haircut, 1920s ideas, and the one who wants to end Social Security (despite the fact that it was Social Security Survivor’s benefits which helped him to get his college education)! Ryan, now a millionaire (of course – who BUT a millionaire could come up with such a disgusting budget?) was quick to accuse Obama of making a politically-motivated speech rather than dealing with our mounting debt.  ”History will not be kind to a president who, when it came time to confront our generation’s defining challenge, chose to duck and run,” said Ryan. “Defining challenge” indeed! Ryan, typical reactionary Republican that he is, has both his facts AND his priorities all screwed up! For it is the ever-rising disparity in wealth, NOT the budget deficit, which is our REAL “defining challenge” today!  And it is the outright refusal of hard core ideologues like himself which has kept the richest 1% from receiving a tax inxrease to tax them THEIR FAIR SHARE, which has ADDED to this budget deficit! Both Romney and Ryan hve accused the President of being “out of touch” with the average American. Romney has even been galavanting around insinuating that high gas prices are Obama’s fault! What a load of hot air! For it has been the hands-pff economic approach so favored by modern Republicans tht has allowed irresponsible Wall Street speculation to flourish and drive prices (but not workers’ wages) ever-skyward! Not only that, but Romney, who has never known a hungry night his entire life, or Ryan, who wants to ditch Social Security now that it has already benefitted HIM, are the ones who are truly “out of touch!” In reality, it has been these Republicans – Romney and Ryan, Boehner and Cantor, McConnell and all the rest of them, who are completely out of touch with the wants and needs of the American public at large!

This November , we will be faced with a clear choice: to vote for the party of reaction, which means to choose old-fashioned, backward, for-the-rich-only politicians; to sit at home and do nothing, thereby allowing Romney and his far, far-right GOP 1%ers to sweep to power and wreak complete havoc on the rest of us; or to vote for progressives who really care about the MAJORITY 99% that are not rich and will work to preserve the great things we have achieved so far, while battling for good-paying jobs and a more equitable society in the long run.

I know the route I’ll be taking this election. Do YOU?

Posted in Bush tax cuts for the rich, commentary, conservative Republicans, corporatist, economics, Politics, Progressives, reactionary Republicans, taxes, Tea Party, the 1%, THE MAJORITY 99% | Tagged , , , , , , | 14 Comments

THE END OF OUR FIRST REPUBLIC (1776-2012)!

By Jack Jodell, Apr. 2, 2012

Many here in America have a tendency to ridicule the French, whom we seem to  view as weak, indecisive, conceited, and unreliable. While it is true that we had to assist them in both World Wars, and picked up the reins of battle from them to fight the Vietnam War, we conveniently forget that, were it not for timely French assistance in our own Revolutionary War, we might well have failed in our bid to become an independent nation.  So I won’t join the French-bashing crowd, especially now that our prolonged period of political polarization and infighting is beginning to resemble periods of French political instability. I think we Americans, especially today, can learn something from French political history…

We tend to look at the French Revolution, which began in 1792, and was inspired by our own, with a mixture of curiosity and horror. On one hand, we are glad that the French people fought to establish a republic and cast off its monarchy, as we did with Britain. But on the other, we are aghast at what this revolution led to: the public execution by guillotine of not only French nobles, but thousands of innocent citizens as well in a fearsome reign of terror. This period was known in French history as the First Republic, and lasted from 1792-1804, when, after years of instability and upheaval, Napoleon Bonaparte seized control and proclaimed himself Emperor. He embarked France on a period of militarism, which led to spectacular military victories at first but eventual defeat and personal exile, as well as the restoration of the French mobarchy.

France took another shot at republicanism with the establishment of the Second Republic in 1848. Beset by continual intrigue and political turmoil, with monarchists, socialists, and even the church at each other’s throats, this experiment in democracy failed by December of 1852, when the Second French Empire was proclaimed by Napoleon III, to be run later by Emile Olivier and Charles Cousin-Montauban, respectively. Eventually, mounting changes throughout Europe, including both the rise of Prussia as the dominant continental power and the increasing attraction of the French working class to the revolutionary political and economic theories of Karl Marx caused this regime to fall as well, in 1870.

The Third Republic which resulted, managed to survive not only the French defeat in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871, but also World War I and the Great Depression. Its hallmark was a rather weak executive branch, and it began in turmoil, as monarchists first dominated it and then anarchists and other leftists opposed it. The Catholic church also jockeyed for political influence, with a large number of clergy and bishops supporting and arising from the consevative monachist class. French liberal republicans, buoyed by Protestant and Jewish support, passed numerous laws which weakened the church’s political influence. This created anti-Semitism as well as much suspicion of the church, and other deep rifts in French society, some of which persist to this day. At one point, all Catholic parochial schools within the country were closed down, and all church property was confiscated!  In World War I, ever-fearful of German militarism and anxious to avenge its defeat in the Franco-Prussian War a generation earlier, Georges Clemenceau led his nation into war against Germany. His insistence on harsh, punitive measures against Germany following that conflict eventually led to the rise of Adolf Hitler in Germany, the crushing French defeat by the Nazis in World War II, and the death of the Third Republic, with the occupation of France by Germany, in 1940.

What followed was a dark period known as Vichy France. Marshal Phillippe Petain, a World War I hero, managed to secure some autonomy for southern France after Germany had overrun the north and began an occupation there. His collaborate effort enabled him to set up a dummy government run by him (but heavily dominated by the Nazis) in the southern city of Vichy, which lasted until all of France was liberated at the end of World War II. After that disaster, Petain was tried and sentenced to death for treason, but the sentence was commuted to life in prison.

Following the war, the French people voted  overwhelmingly  in favor of a new cpnstitution, and so the Fourth Republic came into being. The concept of this new republic was widely supported, but its actual constitution was supported by only a slight plurality of voters. Nearly one third of French voters stayed home, not even bothering to vote for it. This lack pf support, characterized by numerous short-lived successive governments,  along with French defeat in Vietnam and restless revolt in its African colonies  evebtually led to its failure in 1958. The army was threatening a revolt, and, faced with possible civil war, French Resistance hero General Charles DeGaulle stepped in to save the day.

DeGaulle came out of semi-retirtrement to help draw up a new constitution creating a strengthened presidency. It was approved by voters and so began the current Fidth Republic. He himself was then elected President late in 1958 with strong center-right support, and ruled by decree, and with popular consent, umtil he had straightened out his country. He then guided France until he resigned following widespread student protests in 1969. His successors have consisted of both center-right and center-left, including socialist, political persuasions, but the important thing is that France’s national government has remained strong and fully functioning.
——————————————————————————————
Here in the United States, we have managed to hold onto one republican form of government since 1776. Our forefathers were wise enough to see the need for future generations to be able to amend our constitution as needed from time to time to fit changing circumstances, so they provided for a means to do so, Not that we have always been fully cohesive in our political history, because we have not. We struggled early on with whether or not to have a a National Bank; through numerous panics and depressions; through debates, compromises, and finally a Civil War over the issue of slavery; through two world wars and a threat first from militant communism and later through radicalized Islam. We have survived even the assassination of four Presidents. Yet through it all, our American republic has managed to save itself by adapting itself and its constitution to the situations at hand. Unlike France, we have managed to remain one republic – the First American Republic, if you will. We have always been a nation built on a solid system of laws, and we have more often than not abided by these laws and changed them if necessary, as in the case of the Volstead Act, which brought on Prohibition in the 1920s until it was finally repealed in 1933. And we have always acknowledged the right of the opposite political party to elect candidates and pass laws, knowing that once our side returned to power we could modify those laws.  Until recently, that is…

I read in the paper this past week that our corporatist, very activist Supreme Court may very well declare the recently-passed Affordable Health Care Act unconstitutional. That would be a tragedy, but not a complete disaster. Other laws have been declared unconstitutional and we have survived with our republic intact. The article went on to say, however, that the Court may very well eradicate Medicaid, a program for the poor which has been in existence for 50 years, and drastically redefine the relationship our federal government has with our individual statr governments, weakening it in the process.

Then it dawned on me. A pattern began emerging. I remembered how first, the Republican Party became swallowed up whole by the far-right. These reactionaries, who hate the federal government to begin with, want total and absolute control of all branches of government and will rely on sinister, self-centered and very monied resources to attain their goal. They have set up shadowy groups like ALEC to dominate the passage of legislation. They will lie (primarily through their corporately-owned media like the devious Fox “News”), cheat, steal, disenfranchise – whatever it takes – to realize their aims. One sees unmistakable signs of what they’re up to everywhere. They managed to elect a body of like-minded reactionaries under the name of the Tea Party to obstruct legislation in 2010. They have managed to give the richest 1% huge tax breaks and have prevented any tax increases on them ever since, in spite of record deficits. They have already bought-off large numbers of Congressional members and have thwarted very necessary attempts to re-regulate big business. Worse than that, they have now attained a working majority on the Supreme Court. That’s where this current nonsense of corporations being people and money being free speech has found a welcome home. They will use this court to eventually do away with virtually every single piece of pro-people and regulatory legislation passed over the past 77 years. In so doing, they will radically alter our entire country in all aspects. They will, in effect, destroy our democracy and supplant it with an autocratic, neo-Fascist  corpocracy which will severely limit individual social and economic rights, to ensure the highest degree of profitability for a tiny elite few. 

We cannot allow the ultra-rich far-right to destroy our democracy in such a fashion. To this end, we must throw every conservative Republican we can out of office to prevent this dirty, sneaky coup d’etat from happening. They have proven they have little regard for voters or for the will of the people through continued attempts to benefit the rich at the expense of everyone else. The time has come for we Americans to emulate France and do a major overhaul on this republic. So say goodbye to our First Republic, people. The far-right has killed it, and now it is up to us progressives, through some sort of modern-day American DeGaulle, to construct a second, much better, and more egalitarian one.

Posted in commentary, conservative Republicans, extremists, Fox "News", History, Politics, Progressives, reactionary Republicans, taxes, Tea Party, the 1%, very activist Supreme Court | Tagged , | 16 Comments

Neither A Fascist; Nor A Socialist: What President Obama REALLY Is!

By Jack Jodell, Mar. 28, 2012

In recent, previous posts, I have thoroughly shredded the claims advanced by the extremist, completely out-of-the-mainstream extreme right wing that Barack Obama is either a Fascist or a Socialist. For, this group of ignorant, bitterly partisan reactionary Republicans (who mistakenly claim they are conservatives) have chosen the insane paths of name-calling and obstructionism rather than adopting the sane paths of honest discussion and compromise when it has come to the President’s agenda. On very rare occasions they have passed parts of Obama’s bills, but have done so only after offering a large  amount of worthless political posturing, grandstanding, and pure unadulterated noise.  

I won’t keep you in suspense about what I believe is the most accurate description of the President: he is a left-leaning reformer who is also a CORPORATIST. Notice that I said left-leaning rather than leftist, liberal, or progressive. For he has been anything but a flaming, far-left liberal or progressive, and has actually been much more of amainstream capitalist than anything else. In fact, when he took office, with the Dow plunging, the rate of job losses exceeding 700,000 PER MONTH,  and the economy in freefall and contracting, he managed to actually SAVE capitalism in this country! He did so by giving massive government-funded financial aid packages to the nation’s biggest banks on Wall Street, as well as to the ailing American automobile industry. His stimulus package contained massive tax cuts for corporations but much less for small, mom and pop  businesses. You’ll note that only the biggest Wall Street banks got stimulus funds: nothing was made available to much smaller banks. These were hardly the actions of some wild-eyed, radical-left extremist! After all, it was not his fault that nearly all of these big Wall Street banks chose to pocket this money and sit on it, or waste it on huge executive bonuses, rather than make it available to smaller banks who would have gotten it into the hands of small businesses and individuals much sooner!  As a result, unemployment has remained higher than it should be, but has nonetheless slowly come down in spite of ever-rising, much higher energy costs. American auto manufacturers have completely recovered, and are making profits and issuing profitable stocks and dividends to investors once more. There have been changes along the way, to be sure. Much were needed and some were painful. But the very thought of Obama having saved the capitalist system while somehow mysteriously converting it to a socialist one is utterly preposterous!

Speaking of Wall Street and higher energy costs, the main cause of high gasoline prices has been due to irresponsible, greedy Wall Street speculators! Obama has simply not gone after them the way a true liberal might have done, and has instead allowed the “free market” so beloved by conservatives to rule the day, much to the detriment of the rest of the country! He also extended the ridiculous and wholly unneeded Bush tax cuts for the wealthy for two additional years, yet another indication of his corporatist-bent. Were he an actual liberal, he would have ended those tax cuts his very first day in office and would have pressed for even HIGHER taxes on the richest 1%. Unstead, he has weakly advocated a mere return to the Clinton-era tax rates, which represents an increase of LESS THAN 5%. But oh, has this puny step ever made conservaties dump abuse all over him! Rather than castigating him,however, conservatives should feel greatly relieved that his administration has taken such a mild approach to wealth redistribution, a redistribution which is very badly needed in this country at present after more than 3 solid decades of income being redistributed UPWARD to the very richest!

Obama began his presidency with several notable and very key holdovers from the previous Bush administration. Rather than sweeping his slate completely clean, he hung onto Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner, and Robert Gates, and even grabbed Leon Panetta from the previous Clinton administration. These were hardly the actions of a radical-left socialist, and were instead remarkably conservative in nature. He originally hinted at, but quickly abandoned, support for a public option, single-payer choice for his health care plan. The plan that passed Congress narrowly, after a bitter partisan debate, was far more friendly to the existing for-profit insurance companies than it proved to be beneficial to the American citizen. For, while it did restrict insurance companies from arbitrarily excluding participants, it guaranteed them vastly greater numbers through its individual mandates for the public. Day to day control of the industry remained in private hands, and neither rates charged nor the industry’s administration of health care were threatened by government regulation other than the stipulation that no one can be excluded from coverage. Yet no sooner was the bill passed than conservative Republicans derisively began calling it “Obamacare” and threatened to repeal it once they regained control of the White House. Numerous lawsuits, many funded by the insurance companies themselves, came into being, and the battle has now gone before the Supreme Court as to the program’s constitutionality. But clearly, this was NOT an attempt by Obama to directly control America’s health care industry or subvert the capitalist system!

In the area of national defense, the President has disappointed many on the left who thought he would eradicate the use of rendition as well as close down the notorious interrogation base at Guantanamo. He has also stepped up the use of drones in Pakistan, and even found and killed Osama Bin Laden, something his predecessor, who spoke loudly but actually accomplisheed little, was never able to achieve. So much for the ignorant, silly claim by the far-right that Obama is secretly a Muslim! While Obama did in fact end the war in Iraq, and promises to do the same in Afghanistan, that war still rages on as of this writing, and the same questonable support contractors (Halliburton and Xe) remain part of the picture. They have profited handsomely as they have done over the past decade. If this isn’t corporatism in action, I don’t know what is!

The disastrous BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is yet another example of how corporatist the President has been. True, there was much ballyhoo made about BP being forced to ante up $20 billion to help repair the damage it wrought. But now, long after the initial  uproar, very little of this money has made it into the hands of needy Gulf residents whose lives were drastically impacted by BP’s irresponsibility. Instead, millions of BP’s advertising money has been funneled into a lying twlevision propaganda campaign, which tells us the Gulf is all back to normal and businesses are thriving again. This is a massive lie, because nothing of the sort has occurred! Instead, wildlife and human alike are being poisoned by the after-effects of the supposedly safe oil-dispersing agents which were poured over the oil slicks. Many cases of respiratory illness and even cancer have been claimed by local residents, but all of this has gone mostly unreported in the mainstream media and apparently igmored or silenced by the White House. So much for Obama being a dangerous anti-business socialist! The truth of the matter is that, from day one, he has in many ways been one of corporate America’s biggest friends! 

The President’s far-right critics are simply dead wrong when they call him a fascist or a socialist and resort to the ridiculous name-calling they do. For he has been mainly a more-conservative-than-many reform Democrat, and has shown only a half-hearted stab at liberalism with his health care plan and very modest regulatory changes for Wall Street. Because of this, he has been a source of much disappointment and frustration to those on the traditional left, including many workers and labor unions. He has been a friend rather than an ogre to capitalism in general, and save for the occasional call for much-needed greater regulation in certain  areas, has been very moderate in his approach to economics. He is neither the threat nor the beast that the far-right has portrayed him as. For, by and large, he has been in many degrees one of them: a CORPORATIST.

With this in mind, the reactionary far-right should just shut its collective big mouth and START GOVERNING! For every new petty name-calling incident proves that THEY are the ones who are anti-democracy and anti-American, and can blame no one but themselves for the anger voters will deservedly vent against them next November!   

Posted in "free market" economics, Bush tax cuts for the rich, capitalism, commentary, conservative Republicans, economics, extremists, labor unions, Lying TV ads, Osama bin Laden, Politics, Progressives, reactionary Republicans, regulation, taxes, wealth disparity | 13 Comments

THE 57 CENT CHURCH

By Jack Jodell, Mar. 25, 2012

Here is an amazing and endearing little story sent to me by my cousin Patty in Philadelphia. It is a bit of a departure from that which I usually run here, but I hope you will nonetheless enjoy it as much as I did, regardless of your position on religion. This is a tale of innocence and beauty, and stands as a testament of the good which can come from turning that innocence into solid action!

THE 57 CENT CHURCH

A little girl, Hattie May Wiatt, stood near a small church from which she had been turned away because it was “too crowded.”
“I can’t go to Sunday School,” she sobbed to the pastor as he walked by.
Seeing her shabby, unkempt appearance, the pastor guessed the reason and, taking her by the hand, took her inside and found a place for her in the Sunday school class. The child was so happy that they found room for her, and she went to bed that night thinking of the children who have no place to worship Jesus.
Some two years later, this child lay dead in one of the poor tenement buildings. Her parents called for the kindhearted pastor who had befriended their daughter to handle the final arrangements.
As her poor little body was being moved, a worn and crumpled red purse was found which seemed to ha ve been rummaged from some trash dump.
Inside was found 57 cents and a note, scribbled in childish handwriting, which read: “This is to help build the little church bigger so more children can go to Sunday School.”
For two years she had saved for this offering of love.
When the pastor tearfully read that note, he knew instantly what he would do. Carrying this note and the cracked, red pocketbook to the pulpit, he told the story of her unselfish love and devotion.
He challenged his deacons to get busy and raise enough money for the larger building.
But the story does not end there….
A newspaper learned of the story and published It. It was read by a wealthy realtor who offered them a parcel of land worth many thousands.
When told that the church could not pay so much, he offered to sell it to the little church for 57 cents.
Church members made large donations. Checks came from far and wide.. Within five years the little girl’s gift had increased to $250,000.00–a huge sum for that time (near the turn of the last century). Her unselfish love had paid large dividends.


When you are in the city of Philadelphia, look up TEMPLE BAPTIST CHURCH, with a seating capacity of 3,300.

 

 

And be sure to visit TEM{LE UNIVERSITY, where thousands of students are educated. 

Have a look, too, at the GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL and at a Sunday School building which houses hundreds of beautiful children, built so that no child in the area will ever need to be left outside during Sunday School time.

In one of the rooms of this building may be seen the picture of the sweet face of the little girl whose 57 cents, so sacrificially saved, made such remarkable history.


Alongside of it is a portrait of her kind pastor, Dr. Russell H. Conwell, author of the book, “Acres of Diamonds”.
This is a true story, which goes to show WHAT GOD CAN DO WITH 57 CENTS!

Posted in commentary | Tagged , , , , , | 7 Comments